Navigating the Challenges: Rethinking Societies at IoBM

By Fatima Asim

Unlike the Order of the Phoenix in the Harry Potter universe, with all its wizardly oddities and secret society allure, IoBM is no home to such iconicness. Having spent a considerable amount of time on campus, it became evident to me how the dark clouds of dread engulfed student life, resembling a lifeless painting or a colorless doodle—pleasing in its own way, yet lacking the vibrancy it deserves. Every day at IoBM is a new day, but not in a fun way. Each new day exudes an air of strangeness and stagnant existence among students, whose creative intellect seems to have been drained from their bodies, much like the SunSip Advertisement we used to see in our childhood. With a constant buzz of monotony permeating each passing year, many of us wonder where we are headed.

It is fair to say that the managerial class at IoBM could show more interest in the contemporary world and its relevance to the minds they are nurturing within this institute. It wouldn't be inaccurate to suggest that IoBM has produced several revolutionaries in their respective fields. Hence, I pose the question: Doesn't the mechanism of "catering" to students need an upgrade over time? In today's world, institutes play a pivotal role in facilitating individuals who strive for brilliance. However, we do have reservations about the extent to which the university and its authorities allow us to pitch our ideas and receive the necessary support. On the other hand, students are granted some level of freedom, albeit selectively, to form, recruit, and execute ideas. Unfortunately, some ideas are so difficult to navigate through the bureaucratic channels that they often get stuck in the budget stream, ultimately stifling the brilliance of the minds behind them.

Do I suggest that there is a creative crisis plaguing the societies at IoBM? Absolutely. While I acknowledge the formation of intellectually stimulating and purpose-driven communities, it is essential to pause and question whether they are effectively pursuing their objectives. I wonder how their shortcomings can be so invisible to the naked eye. Perhaps, I find myself standing amidst the clouds, attempting to justify it as best as I can. Nevertheless, my constructive critique is intended for those responsible for this creative massacre. I might be hinting at those who manage the societies while being part of them—the executives, the cream of the crop within these societies. You may wonder what made me think there might be a problem there.

Aligning with the general perception of the student body, the societies themselves are deeply entrenched in an exclusivity culture that often causes them to forget that communities should not be divided by hierarchies but rather united, collectively creative, and functional. More than half of the societies lack approachability and fail to engage students, making them appear more primitive than dinosaurs. The lack of functionality and the appointment of executives without relevant soft skills, particularly people skills, is the primary reason why students find themselves entangled in layers of contemplation even before considering joining these societies. In a world where we readily join online subcultures or communities without a second thought, we subject ourselves, including me, to countless dimensions of analysis before deciding on signing up for society. It's not a lack of confidence among the students presented with the opportunity but rather a failure on the part of those who present it.

Consider this critique as a healthy assessment rather than a venomous outburst of dissatisfaction. Fresh batches of students entering the campus expect guidance from their seniors concerning campus activities. However, speaking from personal experience, the existing student body itself often lacks awareness of what is happening around them. Observations and popular opinions suggest that societies struggle to market their activities effectively and reach out to students. While some popular societies remain relevant for only a day or two, with a minimal presence on campus, the majority of activities require students to engage outside the campus, without any obligation from the university but at the disposal of societies—or rather, "sub-communities." These societies fail to consistently engage students in productive and stimulating activities throughout the year, neglecting to create the social atmosphere that a thriving educational institute of this magnitude requires. While some of these communities do engage motivated students with brilliant ideas, assisting in the design and execution of activities, many fall short.

Having participated in the Open House Activity held on campus last year, I had the opportunity to closely observe the societies and their members. While this event was meant to be a celebration, I couldn't help but notice how certain societies with massive budgets overshadowed others, creating a nuisance with loudspeakers and unnecessary chanting. While some may argue that this was their way of marketing and promoting their society, it seemed more like an attempt to prevent any other society from shining through. However, most societies at IoBM are built on an intellectual basis and don't require extravagant marketing to prove their worth. Their ideologies and work should speak for themselves.

Nevertheless, it's disheartening to witness the condescending attitude of societies that are only relevant for a day or two. They often look down upon other societies and lack the spirit of collaboration and mutual support that is crucial for the betterment of the institute and the student body as a whole.

We must address the overly competitive nature of these societies and their executives, as it hinders the thriving student life and campus culture. These executives need to consider the opinions of their members and actively work towards implementing them. The time has come for the societies, which are created for the students, to truly work for and with the students, rather than favoring a select few individuals at the top. We belong to one of the most prestigious business institutes in the country, and it's our responsibility to present a united front and foster a healthy student culture.

Instead of simply complaining about the problems, we should come together and find solutions. Let's take ownership of our institute and collaborate to create a safe, inclusive, and democratic campus atmosphere. Together, we can make a positive difference and ensure a brighter future for IoBM.